Federal Office of Karl-Theodor Freiherr zu Guttenberg, Member of Parliament and
What is a Fake? What is plagiarism? What is a false affirmation under oath?
Only the insiders will be able to make a connection between these three terms. The rest of the BRD-Michel remains clueless.
This refers in particular to the recent allegations against the still-Defence Minister Karl Theodor zu Guttenberg, which is said to have cheated massively in the preparation of his dissertation. While the mass
no scandal herein recognize would, because it will have on the matter be damned, be worn so far no approach calls for his resignation from the sunny boy.
The Plebs behaves more calmly.
And because this is so drowned out the media mafia because even that the man on the street, the woman behind the counter of the bakery shop and the Hartz IV recipients completely damn is the one who - with or without a Ph.D. - the rather unpopular post of defense minister exercises.
The boring and unpopular predecessor named Jung has long since passed from the memory of the responsible citizen. He was only a temporary solution anyway. Now that the media bully Karl Theodor zu Guttenberg from Bavaria, the CSU, his place is taken in the battle for non-existing reputation of the Bundeswehr soldiers in Afghanistan seemed this for the media mafia, the ideal candidate to represent.
always available for a sensational interview, continuously for a "Cheese" wide-screen smile ready and then still married to an attractive woman, "STUPID" Newspaper readers who want more wat? Said Karl Theodor was from Bavaria, the state of origin of the supposedly smartest children, are the biggest accounts and the biggest cars are driven,
Within this - from complacency only so exuberant - environment Karl Theodor is our sunshine boy grew up. He was in his childhood on the sunny side of life. Poverty, thrift and existential need it are just as strange as the question of what he will do in his young political career if it had to do, in fact because of his recent alleged impropriety in connection with a document issued a 5-year dissertation the hat. What
him now - after the misjudgment in connection with the armed forces in Afghanistan and the disaster spectacle insert troops during a visit there - is beaten to his deaf ears, until the second look quite explosive.
Karl Theodor is literally in his doctoral work longer passages have written off, no make them as citations identified. This may be a little more cheating for the outsider, is it not.
Anyone who submits a research paper to the Audit Committee, at the same time give a written statement in which he assured the same oath that he in the preparation of this work, only the resource has served herein. Whoever takes over opinions, research results or other material from other publications, it must make the marked by references. So called in - and outlet lines are common here. Further, the source must be exact.
We lawyers are very meticulous. Not only that is placed in jurisprudence so many words on the famous gold scales, no, the exact copy is accurate to characterize.
If Karl Theodor now said to have spent his doctorate in the foreign ideas as his own, so this is not extraordinary. There is a whole litany of ways, a pretty title, like that of Dr. jur. to obtain. Who has enough financial resources available, then sprang also from a wealthy family with an aristocratic pedigree is allowed to have peaceful use of a "ghost writer" without notice it in Bavaria. Who is stingy, however, and the scientific Not work for 50.000, - € up can create, but chooses the cheap Abschreibvariante, must reckon with the fact that he is caught cheating.
So now is in the newspapers about the consequences of this construct lies a'la writing diligently to Guttenberg. From the "superstar" of Merkel's Cabinet may be a cheater caught in the act has become. For Merkel, it may not matter whether the good Karl Theodor now wrongly the Dr. jur. out in his name, for the prosecutor probably not, because the possible action would be barred.
is considered morally, but returns a significant flaw. A possible liar and fraudsters can indeed hardly see a voter in another prominent political position do. The CSU in Bavaria has now definitely another personnel problem. Whether the media bombardment of the Minister to EDEKA case, must show the decision of the called Ombudsman.
0 comments:
Post a Comment